Liverpool Beat Crystal Palace 3-1 as Forwards Show Signs of Cohesion
The Reds secured a 3-1 victory at Crystal Palace, prompting fans to praise the attacking unit's improving chemistry.
Headline and summary written by an AI model from the linked article; not reviewed by a person. How this was made
This story has stopped developing; this page is its permanent record. More from that day
The odds
Each tick is a source publishing on this story
Price data
| Time | Chance of yes |
|---|---|
| now | 5% |
| 10 Nov, 03:14 UTC | 5% |
| 9 Nov, 23:59 UTC | 4% |
| 9 Nov, 21:36 UTC | 5% |
| 9 Nov, 19:00 UTC | 4% |
| 9 Nov, 04:09 UTC | 5% |
| 9 Nov, 01:02 UTC | 4% |
| 9 Nov, 00:23 UTC | 5% |
| 8 Nov, 22:01 UTC | 4% |
| 8 Nov, 19:57 UTC | 5% |
| 8 Nov, 17:29 UTC | 4% |
| 8 Nov, 05:39 UTC | 5% |
| 8 Nov, 00:14 UTC | 6% |
| 7 Nov, 23:35 UTC | 5% |
| 7 Nov, 17:51 UTC | 4% |
| 7 Nov, 02:31 UTC | 5% |
| 5 Nov, 23:44 UTC | 6% |
| 5 Nov, 22:32 UTC | 5% |
| 5 Nov, 13:38 UTC | 6% |
| 5 Nov, 05:57 UTC | 4% |
| 4 Nov, 23:40 UTC | 6% |
| 4 Nov, 21:34 UTC | 4% |
| 4 Nov, 16:13 UTC | 5% |
| 4 Nov, 11:05 UTC | 7% |
| 4 Nov, 08:38 UTC | 6% |
| 4 Nov, 05:17 UTC | 4% |
| 4 Nov, 04:54 UTC | 6% |
| 4 Nov, 04:25 UTC | 4% |
| 4 Nov, 00:22 UTC | 6% |
| 3 Nov, 23:10 UTC | 7% |
| 3 Nov, 22:49 UTC | 5% |
| 3 Nov, 22:19 UTC | 6% |
| 3 Nov, 18:59 UTC | 5% |
| 3 Nov, 07:41 UTC | 6% |
| 2 Nov, 23:44 UTC | 5% |
| 2 Nov, 14:49 UTC | 6% |
| 2 Nov, 00:04 UTC | 5% |
| 1 Nov, 21:12 UTC | 6% |
| 1 Nov, 19:45 UTC | 5% |
| 1 Nov, 17:42 UTC | 8% |
| 1 Nov, 16:58 UTC | 7% |
| 1 Nov, 16:29 UTC | 9% |
| 1 Nov, 15:31 UTC | 10% |
| 1 Nov, 14:01 UTC | 8% |
| 1 Nov, 08:12 UTC | 10% |
| 1 Nov, 06:01 UTC | 9% |
| 1 Nov, 05:33 UTC | 10% |
| 1 Nov, 03:33 UTC | 9% |
| 1 Nov, 02:36 UTC | 8% |
| 1 Nov, 00:41 UTC | 10% |
| 1 Nov, 00:28 UTC | 9% |
| 31 Oct, 22:21 UTC | 8% |
| 31 Oct, 17:49 UTC | 10% |
| 31 Oct, 17:21 UTC | 8% |
| 31 Oct, 16:51 UTC | 6% |
| 31 Oct, 15:59 UTC | 7% |
| 31 Oct, 09:38 UTC | 5% |
| 31 Oct, 00:10 UTC | 6% |
| 29 Oct, 23:04 UTC | 7% |
| 29 Oct, 15:30 UTC | 6% |
| 29 Oct, 13:38 UTC | 7% |
| 29 Oct, 04:21 UTC | 6% |
| 28 Oct, 18:22 UTC | 7% |
| 28 Oct, 17:16 UTC | 7% |
| 28 Oct, 16:02 UTC | 5% |
| 28 Oct, 12:04 UTC | 6% |
| 28 Oct, 05:19 UTC | 7% |
| 28 Oct, 01:00 UTC | 6% |
| 27 Oct, 23:45 UTC | 7% |
| 27 Oct, 22:51 UTC | 6% |
| 27 Oct, 18:12 UTC | 7% |
| 27 Oct, 03:33 UTC | 7% |
| 27 Oct, 01:46 UTC | 6% |
| 26 Oct, 19:15 UTC | 7% |
| 26 Oct, 15:02 UTC | 9% |
| 26 Oct, 13:55 UTC | 10% |
| 26 Oct, 07:06 UTC | 6% |
| 26 Oct, 00:54 UTC | 9% |
| 25 Oct, 21:50 UTC | 7% |
| 25 Oct, 20:47 UTC | 9% |
| 25 Oct, 17:17 UTC | 6% |
| 25 Oct, 16:49 UTC | 9% |
| 25 Oct, 16:28 UTC | 7% |
| 25 Oct, 15:03 UTC | 7% |
| 25 Oct, 14:19 UTC | 6% |
| 24 Oct, 21:51 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Oct, 19:30 UTC | 7% |
| 24 Oct, 19:09 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Oct, 14:27 UTC | 6% |
| 24 Oct, 00:52 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Oct, 21:34 UTC | 7% |
| 23 Oct, 20:28 UTC | 8% |
| 22 Oct, 22:46 UTC | 5% |
| 22 Oct, 09:11 UTC | 4% |
| 22 Oct, 04:27 UTC | 5% |
| 21 Oct, 18:12 UTC | 4% |
| 21 Oct, 01:10 UTC | 5% |
| 20 Oct, 20:02 UTC | 3% |
| 20 Oct, 16:13 UTC | 4% |
| 18 Oct, 12:28 UTC | 5% |
| 18 Oct, 09:26 UTC | 4% |
| 17 Oct, 23:10 UTC | 5% |
| 17 Oct, 21:45 UTC | 4% |
| 17 Oct, 19:11 UTC | 5% |
| 17 Oct, 16:09 UTC | 4% |
| 17 Oct, 05:15 UTC | 3% |
| 15 Oct, 14:50 UTC | 4% |
| 13 Oct, 21:10 UTC | 3% |
| 13 Oct, 06:01 UTC | 4% |
| 12 Oct, 21:54 UTC | 4% |
| 12 Oct, 08:34 UTC | 5% |
| 11 Oct, 21:12 UTC | 4% |
| 11 Oct, 17:30 UTC | 5% |
| 11 Oct, 16:23 UTC | 9% |
| 11 Oct, 00:20 UTC | 7% |
| 10 Oct, 19:24 UTC | 6% |
| 8 Oct, 23:42 UTC | 7% |
| 7 Oct, 19:56 UTC | 6% |
| 7 Oct, 17:52 UTC | 8% |
| 7 Oct, 14:55 UTC | 6% |
| 6 Oct, 20:30 UTC | 8% |
| 6 Oct, 17:53 UTC | 7% |
| 6 Oct, 14:37 UTC | 8% |
| 6 Oct, 07:38 UTC | 7% |
| 6 Oct, 04:02 UTC | 6% |
| 6 Oct, 02:30 UTC | 8% |
| 4 Oct, 02:30 UTC | 9% |
| 4 Oct, 00:47 UTC | 8% |
| 3 Oct, 14:41 UTC | 7% |
| 2 Oct, 21:29 UTC | 8% |
| 2 Oct, 16:23 UTC | 7% |
| 2 Oct, 06:17 UTC | 8% |
| 2 Oct, 00:56 UTC | 7% |
| 1 Oct, 02:07 UTC | 8% |
| 30 Sept, 22:29 UTC | 7% |
| 30 Sept, 08:35 UTC | 8% |
| 30 Sept, 06:41 UTC | 7% |
| 30 Sept, 04:55 UTC | 8% |
| 30 Sept, 03:06 UTC | 7% |
| 29 Sept, 18:39 UTC | 8% |
| 29 Sept, 14:06 UTC | 7% |
| 29 Sept, 05:53 UTC | 8% |
| 28 Sept, 04:46 UTC | 9% |
| 28 Sept, 03:26 UTC | 8% |
| 28 Sept, 01:36 UTC | 9% |
| 27 Sept, 23:44 UTC | 7% |
| 27 Sept, 16:16 UTC | 9% |
| 26 Sept, 09:24 UTC | 7% |
| 26 Sept, 03:08 UTC | 6% |
| 25 Sept, 17:52 UTC | 7% |
| 25 Sept, 15:27 UTC | 6% |
| 25 Sept, 14:16 UTC | 8% |
| 24 Sept, 13:56 UTC | 5% |
The story so far
1 publisher has covered this in 1 article since 8 Nov 2026. www.espn.com published first, on 8 November at 18:07 UTC.
3 prediction markets price this story:
- Liverpool — the market puts it at 5%, with $2k traded in the last 24 hours, closing 13 Jun 2027. The market resolves to Yes if Liverpool wins the 2026-27 English Premier League title. It resolves to No if they do not win that specific championship. Readers often mistake this for a bet on any single match result, such as the linked game against Everton.
- Liverpool — the market puts it at 4%, closing 19 Jun 2027. The market resolves to Yes if Liverpool wins the 2026-27 Champions League title. It resolves to No if any other team wins that specific tournament. Readers often mistake this for a bet on individual match results, but only the final tournament winner matters.
- Liverpool — the market puts it at 11%, with $8 traded in the last 24 hours, closing 5 Jun 2027. The market resolves to Yes if Liverpool wins the 2026-2027 FA Cup. It resolves to No if they do not win that specific tournament. Readers often mistake this for any cup competition, but only the FA Cup counts.
Odds are the market's probability that the outcome happens, updated every few minutes. They are information about what traders expect, not a forecast we make and not investment advice.
Sources
Every article we clustered into this story. Headlines link to the publisher.
Related prediction markets
Linked by software because they are about the same subject. Most ask a different question from the one this story reports, so read each market's own question. How often the link is right
- Kalshi Liverpool · English Premier League Champion 5%
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
- Kalshi Liverpool · Champions League Winner 4%
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
- Kalshi Liverpool · FA Cup Champion 11% −1
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
Have your say
Your call. How does this end?
Free, no money involved. Calls are scored against the market's price when you make them, so backing an underdog that wins scores most. Leaderboard · Your calls
Alert me when the odds move
In this story
- Liverpool
- Crystal Palace