Google DeepMind Puts Gemini Inside Humanoid Robots for Physical AI Tests
The company is testing whether its intelligence can survive in the real world by powering many different robots.
Headline and summary written by an AI model from the linked articles; not reviewed by a person. How this was made
This story has stopped developing; this page is its permanent record. More from that day
The odds
Each tick is a source publishing on this story · 1 more published before price tracking began
Price data
| Time | Chance of yes |
|---|---|
| now | 100% |
| 1 Oct, 03:27 UTC | 100% |
| 1 Oct, 00:58 UTC | 100% |
| 30 Sept, 23:13 UTC | 100% |
| 30 Sept, 22:59 UTC | 100% |
| 30 Sept, 21:08 UTC | 100% |
| 30 Sept, 20:46 UTC | 99% |
| 30 Sept, 20:24 UTC | 98% |
| 30 Sept, 19:53 UTC | 98% |
| 30 Sept, 19:24 UTC | 97% |
| 30 Sept, 18:39 UTC | 99% |
| 30 Sept, 18:14 UTC | 99% |
| 30 Sept, 17:59 UTC | 99% |
| 30 Sept, 17:28 UTC | 96% |
| 30 Sept, 16:59 UTC | 87% |
| 30 Sept, 16:26 UTC | 85% |
| 30 Sept, 15:39 UTC | 94% |
| 30 Sept, 15:23 UTC | 90% |
| 30 Sept, 14:50 UTC | 86% |
| 30 Sept, 14:23 UTC | 83% |
| 30 Sept, 13:57 UTC | 76% |
| 30 Sept, 13:08 UTC | 73% |
| 30 Sept, 12:53 UTC | 70% |
| 30 Sept, 12:24 UTC | 66% |
| 30 Sept, 11:54 UTC | 68% |
| 30 Sept, 11:25 UTC | 69% |
| 30 Sept, 10:36 UTC | 73% |
| 30 Sept, 10:29 UTC | 70% |
| 30 Sept, 09:59 UTC | 65% |
| 30 Sept, 09:25 UTC | 67% |
| 30 Sept, 08:57 UTC | 75% |
| 30 Sept, 08:13 UTC | 82% |
| 30 Sept, 07:58 UTC | 84% |
| 30 Sept, 07:29 UTC | 87% |
| 30 Sept, 06:41 UTC | 91% |
| 30 Sept, 04:06 UTC | 91% |
| 30 Sept, 03:49 UTC | 90% |
| 30 Sept, 00:10 UTC | 89% |
| 29 Sept, 23:54 UTC | 88% |
| 29 Sept, 23:08 UTC | 88% |
| 29 Sept, 22:53 UTC | 88% |
| 29 Sept, 22:10 UTC | 94% |
| 29 Sept, 21:54 UTC | 95% |
| 29 Sept, 21:25 UTC | 94% |
| 29 Sept, 20:49 UTC | 94% |
| 29 Sept, 20:26 UTC | 95% |
| 29 Sept, 19:54 UTC | 95% |
| 29 Sept, 18:39 UTC | 94% |
| 29 Sept, 18:13 UTC | 96% |
| 29 Sept, 17:57 UTC | 96% |
| 29 Sept, 17:25 UTC | 98% |
| 29 Sept, 16:15 UTC | 98% |
| 29 Sept, 15:59 UTC | 98% |
| 29 Sept, 14:36 UTC | 98% |
| 29 Sept, 12:40 UTC | 98% |
| 29 Sept, 12:18 UTC | 98% |
| 29 Sept, 11:21 UTC | 98% |
| 29 Sept, 10:45 UTC | 98% |
| 29 Sept, 10:23 UTC | 98% |
| 29 Sept, 09:59 UTC | 98% |
| 29 Sept, 06:22 UTC | 98% |
| 29 Sept, 05:53 UTC | 98% |
| 28 Sept, 18:54 UTC | 98% |
| 28 Sept, 14:06 UTC | 98% |
| 28 Sept, 12:04 UTC | 99% |
| 28 Sept, 11:17 UTC | 99% |
| 28 Sept, 10:28 UTC | 98% |
| 28 Sept, 09:35 UTC | 98% |
| 28 Sept, 09:26 UTC | 98% |
| 28 Sept, 08:46 UTC | 99% |
| 28 Sept, 07:51 UTC | 99% |
| 28 Sept, 06:59 UTC | 99% |
| 28 Sept, 06:24 UTC | 98% |
| 28 Sept, 04:07 UTC | 98% |
| 28 Sept, 03:50 UTC | 98% |
| 28 Sept, 03:26 UTC | 98% |
| 28 Sept, 02:08 UTC | 98% |
| 28 Sept, 01:43 UTC | 98% |
| 28 Sept, 01:28 UTC | 98% |
| 27 Sept, 23:44 UTC | 98% |
| 27 Sept, 23:16 UTC | 98% |
| 27 Sept, 22:04 UTC | 98% |
| 27 Sept, 18:51 UTC | 98% |
| 27 Sept, 18:27 UTC | 98% |
| 27 Sept, 16:16 UTC | 98% |
| 27 Sept, 15:52 UTC | 98% |
| 27 Sept, 12:01 UTC | 98% |
| 27 Sept, 11:06 UTC | 97% |
| 27 Sept, 09:57 UTC | 97% |
| 27 Sept, 08:42 UTC | 97% |
| 27 Sept, 01:55 UTC | 97% |
| 26 Sept, 18:26 UTC | 98% |
| 26 Sept, 06:16 UTC | 97% |
| 26 Sept, 05:24 UTC | 98% |
| 26 Sept, 04:36 UTC | 98% |
| 26 Sept, 04:01 UTC | 97% |
| 26 Sept, 03:31 UTC | 98% |
| 26 Sept, 03:08 UTC | 98% |
| 26 Sept, 02:02 UTC | 98% |
| 26 Sept, 01:54 UTC | 98% |
| 26 Sept, 00:41 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 22:22 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 21:48 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 21:27 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 20:53 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 20:25 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 19:32 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 19:25 UTC | 97% |
| 25 Sept, 18:22 UTC | 97% |
| 25 Sept, 16:51 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 15:57 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 15:27 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 14:46 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 11:48 UTC | 97% |
| 25 Sept, 11:29 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 10:57 UTC | 97% |
| 25 Sept, 10:29 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 09:57 UTC | 97% |
| 25 Sept, 08:59 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 08:20 UTC | 97% |
| 25 Sept, 07:49 UTC | 97% |
| 25 Sept, 07:14 UTC | 97% |
| 25 Sept, 06:54 UTC | 97% |
| 25 Sept, 06:03 UTC | 97% |
| 25 Sept, 03:17 UTC | 97% |
| 25 Sept, 02:53 UTC | 98% |
| 25 Sept, 01:13 UTC | 98% |
| 24 Sept, 23:39 UTC | 98% |
| 24 Sept, 20:03 UTC | 98% |
| 24 Sept, 12:42 UTC | 97% |
| 24 Sept, 12:23 UTC | 97% |
| 24 Sept, 10:19 UTC | 97% |
| 24 Sept, 09:49 UTC | 97% |
| 24 Sept, 08:29 UTC | 97% |
| 24 Sept, 07:25 UTC | 97% |
| 24 Sept, 05:28 UTC | 97% |
| 24 Sept, 04:43 UTC | 96% |
| 24 Sept, 04:23 UTC | 96% |
| 24 Sept, 03:39 UTC | 96% |
| 24 Sept, 03:26 UTC | 96% |
| 24 Sept, 02:31 UTC | 96% |
| 24 Sept, 02:25 UTC | 95% |
| 23 Sept, 23:27 UTC | 92% |
| 22 Sept, 18:58 UTC | 92% |
| 22 Sept, 13:42 UTC | 93% |
| 22 Sept, 12:57 UTC | 93% |
| 22 Sept, 09:44 UTC | 93% |
| 22 Sept, 08:31 UTC | 93% |
| 22 Sept, 08:14 UTC | 95% |
| 21 Sept, 19:41 UTC | 94% |
| 21 Sept, 15:08 UTC | 94% |
| 21 Sept, 14:48 UTC | 94% |
| 21 Sept, 09:46 UTC | 93% |
| 21 Sept, 01:19 UTC | 92% |
| 21 Sept, 00:38 UTC | 90% |
| 21 Sept, 00:07 UTC | 89% |
| 20 Sept, 17:29 UTC | 89% |
| 20 Sept, 14:15 UTC | 88% |
| 19 Sept, 08:09 UTC | 88% |
| 18 Sept, 00:16 UTC | 89% |
| 17 Sept, 22:15 UTC | 88% |
| 17 Sept, 17:07 UTC | 89% |
| 17 Sept, 10:14 UTC | 88% |
| 17 Sept, 07:41 UTC | 88% |
| 17 Sept, 06:31 UTC | 89% |
| 17 Sept, 05:45 UTC | 88% |
| 17 Sept, 05:19 UTC | 86% |
| 17 Sept, 04:32 UTC | 86% |
| 17 Sept, 04:25 UTC | 89% |
| 17 Sept, 03:24 UTC | 92% |
| 16 Sept, 23:08 UTC | 91% |
| 16 Sept, 21:35 UTC | 89% |
| 16 Sept, 21:05 UTC | 89% |
| 16 Sept, 17:33 UTC | 83% |
| 16 Sept, 16:53 UTC | 82% |
| 16 Sept, 15:43 UTC | 83% |
| 15 Sept, 15:43 UTC | 84% |
The story so far
2 publishers have covered this in 2 articles since 15 Sept 2026. Scientific American published first, on 15 September at 10:00 UTC; theinformation.com followed 29h 37m later. The most recent article, from theinformation.com, appeared on 16 September at 15:36 UTC.
Outlets reporting it: Scientific American, theinformation.com.
2 prediction markets price this story:
- Will there be no next Google Gemini Pro model release by September 30, 2026? — resolved “Yes” on 1 Oct 2026. The Yes outcome occurs if Google does not release a new Gemini Pro model to the general public by September 30, 2026. The No outcome occurs if such a model launches and becomes publicly accessible on or before that date. Readers often mistake closed betas or private access for a valid release, but only models open to the general public count.
- Will there be no next Google Gemini Pro model release by November 1, 2026? — the market puts it at 78%, with $12k traded in the last 24 hours, closing 1 Nov 2026.
Odds are the market's probability that the outcome happens, updated every few minutes. They are information about what traders expect, not a forecast we make and not investment advice.
Sources
Every article we clustered into this story. Headlines link to the publisher.
Related prediction markets
Linked by software because they are about the same subject. Most ask a different question from the one this story reports, so read each market's own question. How often the link is right
- Resolved Will there be no next Google Gemini Pro model release by September 30, 2026? Yes 31d ago
The market favoured Yes at 91% a day out, and it won. How often it's right
Wrong market?
- Polymarket Will there be no next Google Gemini Pro model release by November 1, 2026? 78% +56
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
Have your say
Your call. How does this end?
Free, no money involved. Calls are scored against the market's price when you make them, so backing an underdog that wins scores most. Leaderboard · Your calls
In this story
- Google DeepMind
- Gemini