Chelsea suffer 1-0 defeat to Sunderland as Xabi Alonso faces identity crisis
Xabi Alonso's Chelsea side were beaten 1-0 by Sunderland, highlighting ongoing struggles to find a clear team identity.
Headline and summary written by an AI model from the linked articles; not reviewed by a person. How this was made
First reported by SI Feed, 1h 59m ahead of the next publisher · who breaks stories first
This story has stopped developing; this page is its permanent record. More from that day
The odds
Each tick is a source publishing on this story
Price data
| Time | Chance of yes |
|---|---|
| now | 1% |
| 11 Nov, 23:18 UTC | 1% |
| 10 Nov, 20:27 UTC | 2% |
| 10 Nov, 17:43 UTC | 1% |
| 9 Nov, 23:04 UTC | 2% |
| 9 Nov, 18:04 UTC | 1% |
| 9 Nov, 13:53 UTC | 2% |
| 9 Nov, 10:23 UTC | 1% |
| 9 Nov, 06:56 UTC | 2% |
| 8 Nov, 15:48 UTC | 1% |
| 8 Nov, 13:52 UTC | 2% |
| 8 Nov, 13:26 UTC | 3% |
| 8 Nov, 06:47 UTC | 2% |
| 8 Nov, 05:39 UTC | 3% |
| 7 Nov, 12:31 UTC | 4% |
| 7 Nov, 11:45 UTC | 2% |
| 6 Nov, 04:27 UTC | 3% |
| 6 Nov, 01:02 UTC | 4% |
| 5 Nov, 23:01 UTC | 3% |
| 5 Nov, 21:11 UTC | 4% |
| 5 Nov, 06:26 UTC | 3% |
| 5 Nov, 05:57 UTC | 4% |
| 5 Nov, 03:58 UTC | 3% |
| 4 Nov, 22:27 UTC | 4% |
| 4 Nov, 21:02 UTC | 3% |
| 4 Nov, 18:57 UTC | 4% |
| 4 Nov, 15:50 UTC | 3% |
| 4 Nov, 04:54 UTC | 4% |
| 4 Nov, 04:25 UTC | 3% |
| 3 Nov, 22:41 UTC | 4% |
| 3 Nov, 20:34 UTC | 3% |
| 3 Nov, 19:29 UTC | 4% |
| 3 Nov, 17:58 UTC | 3% |
| 3 Nov, 10:52 UTC | 4% |
| 3 Nov, 04:51 UTC | 3% |
| 3 Nov, 01:24 UTC | 4% |
| 2 Nov, 03:28 UTC | 3% |
| 1 Nov, 21:48 UTC | 5% |
| 1 Nov, 21:05 UTC | 1% |
| 1 Nov, 18:54 UTC | 3% |
| 1 Nov, 17:56 UTC | 5% |
| 1 Nov, 15:16 UTC | 3% |
| 1 Nov, 01:03 UTC | 4% |
| 1 Nov, 00:28 UTC | 4% |
| 31 Oct, 22:21 UTC | 3% |
| 30 Oct, 13:13 UTC | 4% |
| 30 Oct, 02:48 UTC | 3% |
| 30 Oct, 01:03 UTC | 4% |
| 29 Oct, 16:50 UTC | 3% |
| 29 Oct, 12:52 UTC | 4% |
| 29 Oct, 04:14 UTC | 2% |
| 29 Oct, 03:42 UTC | 4% |
| 29 Oct, 03:00 UTC | 2% |
| 28 Oct, 10:16 UTC | 4% |
| 28 Oct, 06:20 UTC | 3% |
| 28 Oct, 03:50 UTC | 2% |
| 27 Oct, 13:48 UTC | 4% |
| 27 Oct, 05:06 UTC | 3% |
| 27 Oct, 03:19 UTC | 4% |
| 25 Oct, 22:54 UTC | 3% |
| 25 Oct, 16:28 UTC | 2% |
| 25 Oct, 15:46 UTC | 3% |
| 25 Oct, 12:49 UTC | 2% |
| 24 Oct, 20:51 UTC | 3% |
| 24 Oct, 19:17 UTC | 2% |
| 24 Oct, 18:29 UTC | 5% |
| 24 Oct, 13:29 UTC | 9% |
| 23 Oct, 15:06 UTC | 8% |
| 23 Oct, 08:00 UTC | 6% |
| 22 Oct, 09:47 UTC | 7% |
| 22 Oct, 03:02 UTC | 6% |
| 22 Oct, 02:47 UTC | 7% |
| 21 Oct, 17:27 UTC | 6% |
| 21 Oct, 05:13 UTC | 7% |
| 21 Oct, 00:22 UTC | 5% |
| 20 Oct, 23:57 UTC | 7% |
| 20 Oct, 18:59 UTC | 7% |
| 20 Oct, 17:10 UTC | 7% |
| 20 Oct, 15:58 UTC | 6% |
| 20 Oct, 12:46 UTC | 7% |
| 18 Oct, 17:38 UTC | 6% |
| 18 Oct, 17:17 UTC | 7% |
| 18 Oct, 16:10 UTC | 6% |
| 18 Oct, 15:22 UTC | 7% |
| 18 Oct, 13:30 UTC | 6% |
| 18 Oct, 12:34 UTC | 7% |
| 18 Oct, 09:26 UTC | 6% |
| 18 Oct, 04:50 UTC | 7% |
| 18 Oct, 01:23 UTC | 6% |
| 17 Oct, 21:25 UTC | 7% |
| 17 Oct, 18:50 UTC | 6% |
| 17 Oct, 16:52 UTC | 7% |
| 17 Oct, 15:15 UTC | 6% |
| 17 Oct, 14:54 UTC | 7% |
| 17 Oct, 13:56 UTC | 6% |
| 17 Oct, 12:20 UTC | 7% |
| 16 Oct, 22:03 UTC | 5% |
| 16 Oct, 16:39 UTC | 7% |
| 16 Oct, 15:24 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Oct, 13:03 UTC | 7% |
| 16 Oct, 10:49 UTC | 5% |
| 16 Oct, 05:42 UTC | 7% |
| 16 Oct, 04:56 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Oct, 03:36 UTC | 5% |
| 16 Oct, 02:48 UTC | 6% |
| 16 Oct, 01:02 UTC | 7% |
| 15 Oct, 22:49 UTC | 6% |
| 15 Oct, 21:34 UTC | 7% |
| 15 Oct, 20:52 UTC | 6% |
| 15 Oct, 14:50 UTC | 7% |
| 15 Oct, 00:09 UTC | 5% |
| 14 Oct, 21:56 UTC | 6% |
| 14 Oct, 21:06 UTC | 7% |
| 14 Oct, 20:18 UTC | 6% |
| 13 Oct, 15:31 UTC | 5% |
| 13 Oct, 11:27 UTC | 7% |
| 13 Oct, 04:34 UTC | 6% |
| 12 Oct, 21:33 UTC | 5% |
| 12 Oct, 17:49 UTC | 6% |
| 12 Oct, 15:07 UTC | 7% |
| 11 Oct, 19:33 UTC | 6% |
| 11 Oct, 19:24 UTC | 7% |
| 11 Oct, 17:57 UTC | 7% |
| 11 Oct, 15:49 UTC | 6% |
| 11 Oct, 12:05 UTC | 7% |
| 11 Oct, 09:40 UTC | 6% |
| 11 Oct, 07:08 UTC | 7% |
| 11 Oct, 03:45 UTC | 6% |
| 10 Oct, 21:12 UTC | 7% |
| 10 Oct, 16:54 UTC | 5% |
| 10 Oct, 14:41 UTC | 6% |
| 10 Oct, 14:20 UTC | 7% |
| 9 Oct, 20:20 UTC | 5% |
| 9 Oct, 09:20 UTC | 4% |
| 8 Oct, 03:48 UTC | 5% |
| 7 Oct, 20:22 UTC | 4% |
| 7 Oct, 07:20 UTC | 5% |
| 6 Oct, 17:53 UTC | 4% |
| 6 Oct, 03:48 UTC | 5% |
| 6 Oct, 00:23 UTC | 4% |
| 5 Oct, 23:29 UTC | 3% |
| 5 Oct, 15:14 UTC | 4% |
| 5 Oct, 04:13 UTC | 5% |
| 5 Oct, 03:07 UTC | 3% |
| 4 Oct, 23:51 UTC | 4% |
| 4 Oct, 23:25 UTC | 5% |
| 4 Oct, 01:07 UTC | 4% |
| 4 Oct, 00:47 UTC | 5% |
| 4 Oct, 00:08 UTC | 4% |
| 3 Oct, 17:00 UTC | 5% |
| 3 Oct, 15:34 UTC | 4% |
| 1 Oct, 17:14 UTC | 5% |
| 1 Oct, 16:44 UTC | 4% |
| 1 Oct, 06:36 UTC | 5% |
| 1 Oct, 06:15 UTC | 4% |
| 30 Sept, 12:38 UTC | 5% |
| 30 Sept, 12:24 UTC | 4% |
| 30 Sept, 08:35 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 23:46 UTC | 4% |
| 29 Sept, 18:39 UTC | 5% |
| 29 Sept, 16:07 UTC | 4% |
| 27 Sept, 15:03 UTC | 5% |
| 26 Sept, 22:14 UTC | 5% |
| 26 Sept, 16:48 UTC | 5% |
| 26 Sept, 11:20 UTC | 6% |
| 25 Sept, 22:40 UTC | 5% |
| 25 Sept, 19:25 UTC | 6% |
| 25 Sept, 18:07 UTC | 5% |
| 25 Sept, 14:39 UTC | 6% |
| 25 Sept, 14:16 UTC | 5% |
| 25 Sept, 12:18 UTC | 4% |
| 25 Sept, 01:06 UTC | 5% |
| 23 Sept, 13:38 UTC | 4% |
| 22 Sept, 13:09 UTC | 5% |
Replay the odds, article by article
Step through each article in the order it published and watch Chelsea respond.
The story so far
3 publishers have covered this in 3 articles since 8 Nov 2026. SI Feed published first, on 8 November at 16:21 UTC; BBC Sport followed 2h 00m later. The most recent article, from SkySports, appeared on 10 November at 10:00 UTC.
Outlets reporting it: SI Feed, BBC Sport, SkySports.
3 prediction markets price this story:
- Chelsea — the market puts it at 1%, with $2k traded in the last 24 hours, closing 13 Jun 2027. The market resolves to Yes if Chelsea wins the 2026-27 English Premier League title. It resolves to No if they do not win that specific championship. Readers often mistake this for a prediction of their current performance or future seasons rather than the definitive outcome of the 2026-27 league.
- Chelsea — the market puts it at 16%, with $1 traded in the last 24 hours, closing 14 Jun 2027. Chelsea must finish in the top two of the 2026-27 English Premier League season for the market to resolve to Yes. Any other finishing position results in a No resolution. Readers often mistake the linked story about a Women's Champions League win as relevant, but only the final league standings determine the outcome.
- Chelsea — the market puts it at 44%, with $139 traded in the last 24 hours, closing 14 Jun 2027. The market resolves to Yes if Chelsea finishes in the top four of the 2026-27 English Premier League season. It resolves to No if they do not finish in that position. Readers often mistake the linked WCL match for the deciding factor, but only the final league standings determine the outcome.
Odds are the market's probability that the outcome happens, updated every few minutes. They are information about what traders expect, not a forecast we make and not investment advice.
How it unfolded
Every source in the order it published, with the odds on Chelsea at that moment. A dash means the source published before we started tracking prices.
Sources
Every article we clustered into this story. Headlines link to the publisher.
Related prediction markets
Linked by software because they are about the same subject. Most ask a different question from the one this story reports, so read each market's own question. How often the link is right
- Kalshi Chelsea · English Premier League Champion 1% −1
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
- Kalshi Chelsea · EPL Top 2 Finishers 16% +2
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
- Kalshi Chelsea · EPL Top 4 Finishers 44% −3
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
Have your say
Your call. How does this end?
Free, no money involved. Calls are scored against the market's price when you make them, so backing an underdog that wins scores most. Leaderboard · Your calls
Alert me when the odds move
In this story
- Xabi Alonso
- Chelsea
- Sunderland