White House Backtracks on Plan to Control NIH Grants
The White House abandons a proposal to give political appointees veto power over National Institutes of Health grants following bipartisan congressional opposition.
Headline and summary written by an AI model from the linked articles; not reviewed by a person. How this was made
This story has stopped developing; this page is its permanent record. More from that day
The odds
Each tick is a source publishing on this story · 12 more published before price tracking began
Price data
| Time | Chance of yes |
|---|---|
| now | 2% |
| 24 Sept, 15:03 UTC | 2% |
| 23 Sept, 08:46 UTC | 31% |
Replay the odds, article by article
Step through each article in the order it published and watch Yes respond.
The story so far
10 publishers have covered this in 17 articles since 19 Sept 2026. Washington Post published first, on 19 September at 03:19 UTC; The Guardian US followed 42h 34m later. The most recent article, from NPR Health, appeared on 24 September at 09:00 UTC.
Outlets reporting it: Washington Post (major outlet), The Guardian US (major outlet), Latest News from Science Magazine (major outlet), Ars Technica (major outlet), The Hill (major outlet), The New York Times (major outlet), NPR Health (major outlet), Scientific American, STAT, Roll Call.
2 prediction markets price this story:
- Yes — the market puts it at 2%, closing 1 Jan 2027. The market resolves to Yes if the US government agrees to or announces a substantive federal action stemming from its Smithsonian pressure campaign before January 1, 2027. Otherwise, it resolves to No. Readers often mistake the linked news headline for the resolution trigger, but only an official US agreement or announcement counts.
- Before Jan 20, 2029 — the market puts it at 35%, closing 20 Jan 2029. Congress must pass legislation that overrides the presidential veto before January 20, 2029 for the outcome to be Yes. The deadline is the date of the new administration's inauguration, not the date of the veto itself. Readers often mistake the news headline about the White House backtracking as the final resolution, but only a successful congressional override counts.
Odds are the market's probability that the outcome happens, updated every few minutes. They are information about what traders expect, not a forecast we make and not investment advice.
How it unfolded
Every source in the order it published, with the odds on Yes at that moment. A dash means the source published before we started tracking prices.
- Washington PostVought pushes for scrutiny of NIH grants in Oval Office clash—
- The Guardian USTrump reportedly to form health funding board that could veto ‘woke’ initiatives—
- Latest News from Science MagazineWhite House move to seize control of NIH grant decisions upsets senators and scientists—
- Ars TechnicaTrump planning to hand veto power over NIH grants to political appointee—
- The HillWhite House drafting executive order to take over NIH grant approvals: Reports—
- Washington PostCongressional leaders warn White House against adding controls over NIH grants—
- Scientific AmericanWhat a Trump order to put political appointees in charge of NIH funding would mean for science—
- The Hill NewsCollins, Murray speak out against reported Trump push to ‘politicize grantmaking’—
- STATSTAT+: Members of Congress push back on plan to create a commission of political appointees to review NIH grants—
- The HillTrump admin reportedly considers NIH grant approval takeover—
Show 7 later sources
- Roll CallLawmakers bristle at Trump effort for tighter control of NIH—
- The HillCollins urges White House not to move forward with NIH grant proposal—
- The HillCollins: White House backing down from NIH grant order31%
- The New York TimesWhite House Backtracks on Plan to Exert New Control Over N.I.H. Grants31%
- STATWhite House plan to increase control of NIH grants appears ‘dead’31%
- Roll CallWhite House drops executive order for tighter NIH purview31%
- NPR HealthUnder Trump, NIH funding disruptions have evolved. Here's what the numbers show31%
- Current odds2%
Sources
Every article we clustered into this story. Headlines link to the publisher.
- Under Trump, NIH funding disruptions have evolved. Here's what the numbers show NPR Health ·
- White House Backtracks on Plan to Exert New Control Over N.I.H. Grants The New York Times ·
- Collins: White House backing down from NIH grant order The Hill ·
- Collins urges White House not to move forward with NIH grant proposal The Hill ·
- Trump admin reportedly considers NIH grant approval takeover The Hill ·
- Collins, Murray speak out against reported Trump push to ‘politicize grantmaking’ The Hill News ·
Show 11 more sources
- Congressional leaders warn White House against adding controls over NIH grants Washington Post ·
- White House drafting executive order to take over NIH grant approvals: Reports The Hill ·
- Trump planning to hand veto power over NIH grants to political appointee Ars Technica ·
- White House move to seize control of NIH grant decisions upsets senators and scientists Latest News from Science Magazine ·
- Trump reportedly to form health funding board that could veto ‘woke’ initiatives The Guardian US ·
- Vought pushes for scrutiny of NIH grants in Oval Office clash Washington Post ·
- White House drops executive order for tighter NIH purview Roll Call
- White House plan to increase control of NIH grants appears ‘dead’ STAT
- Lawmakers bristle at Trump effort for tighter control of NIH Roll Call
- STAT+: Members of Congress push back on plan to create a commission of political appointees to review NIH grants STAT
- What a Trump order to put political appointees in charge of NIH funding would mean for science Scientific American
Related prediction markets
Linked by software because they are about the same subject. Most ask a different question from the one this story reports, so read each market's own question. How often the link is right
- Kalshi Yes 2%
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
- Kalshi Before Jan 20, 2029 35%
Does the market have this right?
Wrong market?
Have your say
Your call. How does this end?
Free, no money involved. Calls are scored against the market's price when you make them, so backing an underdog that wins scores most. Leaderboard · Your calls
Email me when the odds move
In this story
- Donald Trump
- National Institutes of Health
- Susan Collins
- Russ Vought